Since 1933, the IRC has provided hope and humanitarian aid to refugees and other victims of oppression and violent conflict around the world.
The IRC on Twitter
-
Every one of us should feel safe in our own home. Agree? Sign the pledge & RT. t.co/avZIf1iS #dv #vaw
May 22, 2012
-
On the blog: a 21-year old woman in Liberia shares her struggle after surviving a horrific assault by her partner: t.co/ubzUn8JT #dv
May 22, 2012
-
On the blog: Far too often the riskiest place for a woman is where you might least expect it to be—in her own home. t.co/jaDn2j7M #dv
May 22, 2012
-
New @theIRC report: "Let me not die before my time: Domestic violence (#dv) in West Africa." t.co/Gl7kichY #vaw
May 22, 2012
-
@missblair140 Glad you like the t-shirt. Thanks for your support!
May 21, 2012
VOICES FROM THE FIELDTHE IRC BLOG
Working across the aisle to welcome refugees
April 12, 2011
By Alexandra Hardina
A new piece of bipartisan legislation in Congress aims to improve the way the United States welcomes refugees like Mona Rath and his family, who arrived in New York from Nepal in 2009.
Protecting those persecuted because of their race, religion, nationality or political opinion is a proud American tradition. It is also a historically bipartisan issue in Congress, stretching back from the 2008 Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act — which rescued almost 60,000 Iraqi refugees through resettlement in the U.S. — to the 1980 Refugee Act. It is thus all the more exciting to see that different sides of the aisle can agree that reforming the domestic refugee resettlement program is needed so that it works better for refugees and American communities.
Today Congressman Gary Peters along with 19 other Members of Congress introduced a new piece of bipartisan legislation that aims to improve the way the United States welcomes refugees: the Domestic Refugee Resettlement Reform and Modernization Act of 2011 (H.R. 1475). The bill takes a number of important steps toward reforming and modernizing a system that does not always work well. The bill doesn’t seek to overhaul the system; rather it’s a modest and realistic fix that avoids wading into budget debates and yet makes a number of important changes that will benefit all states and communities welcoming refugees.
Some of the specific positive changes that the bill would make include:
- Increasing the profile of the federal office providing services to refugees;
- Collecting vital data related to the needs and vulnerabilities of refugees in order to serve them better and assist communities welcoming them;
- Mandating a comprehensive study of the resettlement program — something the International Rescue Committee (IRC) has advocated for;
- Improving the way state governments get reimbursed for their assistance to refugees — thus strengthening an important piece of the resettlement system.
The IRC applauds this group of Congressmen and women recognizing and tackling the issue — and we applaud Congressman Peters for taking the initiative on this often overlooked subject. Refugees, communities, and resettlement service providers hope the Senate will follow their lead.
Comments
How will this legislation
How will this legislation affect the thousands of refugees currently in the system who are being served by IRC? Does a larger profile mean there will be more case managers? Does more efficient reimbursement for states mean state resources (or Social Security disability benefits) will be more readily available?
Thank you very much for your
Thank you very much for your questions.
How will this legislation affect the thousands of refugees currently in the system who are being served by IRC?
We support this legislation based on the hope and expectation that if enacted its changes to the resettlement program would:
: - help all stakeholders better understand refugees’ needs and thus enable us to enhance planning to address those needs;
- provide a clearer picture of best practices of resettlement in the U.S.;
- allow the federal office which funds refugee services (Office of Refugee Resettlement within the Department of Health and Human Services, HHS/ORR) to have a better system for providing state governments with funds for the cash and medical assistance provided to refugees;
- enable the Office of Refugee Resettlement to provide better services to refugees and better support communities hosting them.
Does a larger profile mean there will be more case managers?
There are many ways an elevated ORR could strengthen the resettlement program, but right now it’s too early to tell. Many of these decisions will be up to the Administration.
Does more efficient reimbursement for states mean state resources (or Social Security disability benefits) will be more readily available?
The legislation does not address mainstream assistance programs such as SSI, instead it addresses reimbursement of state governments for the cash and medical assistance provided to refugees who are not eligible for mainstream programs.
Post new comment
Voices From...
Contributors

























